Skip to main content
Logo-300x300-colored-3
  • Home
  • Services
    • Offensive Security
    • Defensive Security
    • Privacy Engineering
    • AI Advisory
    • AI Assessment
    • AI Integration
  • Products
  • About
    • About Us
    • FAQ's
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • In The Media
    • Podcasts
    • All Resources
Get a Free Assessment
Back to Blog
AI Security Penetration Testing AI in Cybersecurity

Enterprise AI Security Solutions for Mid-Sized Tech 2026

Hannah Perez July 08, 2026 15 min read

Finding the Right AI Security Partner for Your Growing Tech Company

Your engineering team just deployed a new AI-powered customer support system. It's impressive, handling tickets faster than ever, but now your CISO is asking questions you can't easily answer. How do you know the AI isn't leaking sensitive data? What happens if someone manipulates the model? Who's responsible when the AI makes a mistake?

These aren't hypothetical concerns. Mid-sized tech companies face a unique challenge: you're large enough to need enterprise-grade AI capabilities but often lack the dedicated security teams that Fortune 500 companies maintain. Suzu Labs works with organizations exactly like yours, helping them adopt AI confidently while managing the security risks that come with it.

This guide walks you through everything you need to evaluate, implement, and maintain secure AI platforms, from understanding the threat landscape to building governance frameworks that grow with your business.

Key Takeaways: Enterprise AI Security Solutions for Mid-Sized Tech

  • Mid-sized tech companies face unique AI security challenges because they need enterprise capabilities without enterprise-sized security teams.
  • AI systems introduce new attack surfaces across data, models, applications, and infrastructure that traditional security tools weren't designed to address.
  • Suzu Labs helps organizations evaluate AI platform security through services like AI Trust Indexing, penetration testing, and Virtual CISO guidance.
  • Successful AI security requires governance frameworks that balance innovation speed with risk management and compliance requirements.
  • Starting with pilot projects and measurable security metrics allows you to scale AI adoption without introducing unmanaged vulnerabilities.

Why Mid-Sized Tech Companies Face Distinct AI Security Challenges

Large enterprises have dedicated AI security teams, compliance officers, and million-dollar budgets for specialized tools. Startups often move fast with minimal security overhead. Mid-sized tech companies sit in an uncomfortable middle ground.

You're processing enough sensitive data to attract attackers but may not have the resources for 24/7 security operations. Your customers expect enterprise-grade protection, yet your security team might consist of three people wearing multiple hats.

The NIST AI Risk Management Framework provides guidance, but implementing it requires resources many mid-sized companies don't have readily available. This is where strategic partnerships become valuable, working with specialists who understand both AI systems and the constraints of growing organizations.

What Makes AI Systems Different from Traditional Software Security?

AI introduces attack surfaces that your existing security stack wasn't built to handle. Traditional applications follow predictable rules, but AI systems learn, adapt, and sometimes behave in unexpected ways.

The Four Layers of AI Risk

According to security researchers at Palo Alto Networks, AI risk spans four distinct layers. The data layer faces threats like training data poisoning and sensitive information leakage. The model layer can suffer from hallucinations, adversarial inputs, and bias issues.

Your application layer is vulnerable to prompt injection and insecure integrations. And the infrastructure layer requires attention to API security, access controls, and supply chain dependencies. Each layer demands different protective measures.

Why Traditional Security Tools Fall Short

Your existing SIEM and endpoint protection tools were designed for a different threat model. They're excellent at catching known malware signatures and suspicious network traffic. But they can't detect when an AI model has been manipulated through carefully crafted prompts or when training data has been subtly poisoned.

This doesn't mean you should abandon your current security investments. Instead, you need to extend your security posture to address AI-specific risks while maintaining the protections you already have in place.

How Do You Evaluate AI Platform Security Before Adoption?

Before integrating any AI platform into your tech stack, you need a structured evaluation process. The excitement around AI capabilities can overshadow critical security considerations, don't let it.

Data Handling and Privacy Guarantees

Start by understanding exactly what happens to your data. Does the vendor use your inputs to train their models? What data retention policies are in place? Where is data processed and stored geographically?

Look for vendors with explicit no-data-retention policies and SOC 2 Type II certifications. Ask for their data processing agreements and review them with your legal team. If a vendor can't clearly articulate their data handling practices, that's a red flag.

Model Transparency and Explainability

Can you understand why the AI made a specific decision? For regulated industries or high-stakes applications, explainability isn't optional. You need to demonstrate to auditors, customers, and leadership that your AI systems operate within acceptable boundaries.

Request documentation on model architecture, training data sources, and known limitations. Reputable vendors are transparent about what their models can and cannot do reliably.

Integration Security Assessment

AI platforms don't operate in isolation. They connect to your databases, APIs, and internal systems. Each integration point is a potential vulnerability.

Suzu Labs offers penetration testing services specifically designed to evaluate AI integrations. Testing should cover authentication mechanisms, data flow between systems, and potential privilege escalation paths through AI components.

What Security Architecture Should Mid-Sized Companies Build?

You don't need to replicate the security architecture of a tech giant, but you do need intentional design. A well-planned security architecture for AI adoption includes several key components.

Identity and Access Management for AI Systems

AI systems need access controls just like human users do. Apply the principle of least privilege, give AI components only the permissions they need to function. Create dedicated service accounts for AI workloads rather than using shared credentials.

Monitor AI system access patterns. If your customer support AI suddenly starts querying financial databases it's never touched before, that's worth investigating immediately.

Network Segmentation and Data Isolation

Separate AI workloads from your most sensitive systems. If an AI component is compromised, proper segmentation limits how far an attacker can move laterally through your network.

Consider where your AI processes data. For highly sensitive operations, on-premises or private cloud deployments may offer better control than public AI services, even if they require more infrastructure investment.

Logging and Monitoring Requirements

You can't protect what you can't see. Log all AI system interactions: inputs, outputs, model versions, and user activity. These logs serve multiple purposes—security monitoring, debugging, compliance audits, and incident investigation.

Integrate AI logs with your existing SIEM platform. Create specific alert rules for suspicious patterns like unusual query volumes, attempts to extract model information, or outputs that violate your content policies.

How Do You Protect Against AI-Specific Attacks?

Traditional cybersecurity focuses on protecting systems from unauthorized access. AI security adds another dimension: protecting systems from being manipulated through authorized access channels.

Defending Against Prompt Injection

Prompt injection occurs when malicious instructions are hidden within seemingly normal inputs. An attacker might submit a customer support ticket that includes instructions telling the AI to reveal confidential information or bypass its safety guidelines.

Implement input validation layers that sanitize user inputs before they reach your AI models. Separate system instructions from user-provided content using clear boundaries. Test your defenses regularly, Suzu Labs' red teaming services can simulate these attacks to identify weaknesses before adversaries do.

Preventing Data Leakage Through AI Outputs

AI models can inadvertently reveal sensitive information in their responses. If your model was trained on proprietary data, careful prompting might extract that information.

Deploy output filtering that scans AI responses for sensitive data patterns before delivery. Implement content classification to flag responses that might contain personal information, financial data, or intellectual property.

Detecting Model Manipulation and Drift

Models can be manipulated through adversarial inputs or may drift over time as their behavior changes. Establish baseline behavior metrics and monitor for deviations.

Regular model evaluation catches problems before they impact your business. Schedule periodic assessments that test model accuracy, bias, and safety characteristics against your original benchmarks.

What Governance Framework Should You Implement?

AI governance isn't about slowing down innovation, it's about ensuring you can sustain innovation without creating unmanaged risks. A practical governance framework for mid-sized companies includes several elements.

Building Your AI Inventory

You can't govern what you don't know exists. Create a central registry of all AI use cases in your organization. Document the purpose, data used, model provider, integrations, and risk level for each.

Don't forget shadow AI, employees using public AI tools without IT approval. According to recent surveys, a significant percentage of knowledge workers use AI tools that haven't been vetted by their security teams. Discovery and documentation come before policy enforcement.

Defining Risk-Based Controls

Not every AI application carries the same risk. An internal chatbot helping employees find HR policies has different security requirements than an AI system making customer credit decisions.

Categorize your AI use cases by risk level and apply proportionate controls. Low-risk applications might need basic monitoring. High-risk applications require human-in-the-loop oversight, extensive logging, and regular audits.

Establishing Clear Ownership and Accountability

Every AI system needs an owner responsible for its security and performance. This owner should understand both the technical capabilities and business context of the system.

For mid-sized companies without dedicated AI security roles, consider Suzu Labs' Virtual CISO services. A Virtual CISO can help establish governance frameworks, define policies, and guide your team through security decisions without requiring a full-time executive hire.

How Do You Address AI Security Compliance Requirements?

Regulatory requirements around AI are evolving rapidly. While specific mandates vary by industry and geography, several principles apply broadly to mid-sized tech companies.

Understanding Your Compliance Landscape

Start by mapping which regulations apply to your AI use cases. If you handle healthcare data, HIPAA requirements extend to your AI systems. Financial services face sector-specific guidelines. Companies serving European customers must consider GDPR implications for AI processing.

The EU AI Act introduces risk-based requirements that will affect many technology companies regardless of where they're headquartered. Stay informed about upcoming requirements and build flexibility into your governance approach.

Documenting AI Systems for Auditors

Auditors will ask questions you need to answer clearly. What data does this AI use? How was it trained? What decisions does it make? Who approved its deployment? What controls prevent misuse?

Maintain documentation that answers these questions before auditors ask. Include model cards describing your AI systems, records of security assessments, and logs demonstrating ongoing monitoring and incident response.

Managing Vendor Compliance

When you use third-party AI platforms, their compliance becomes your concern. Request SOC 2 reports, data processing agreements, and documentation of their security controls.

Include AI-specific provisions in your vendor contracts. Require notification of security incidents, changes to data handling practices, and access to audit reports. Your compliance posture depends partly on your vendors' practices.

What Are the Key Steps to Implement AI Security Successfully?

Moving from planning to implementation requires a structured approach. Here's a practical roadmap for mid-sized tech companies adopting AI securely.

Phase One: Assessment and Planning

Begin with a thorough assessment of your current security posture and AI adoption plans. Identify the AI use cases you want to pursue and the data they'll require. Map these against your existing security controls to identify gaps.

This phase should produce a prioritized list of security improvements needed before AI deployment. Suzu Labs' vulnerability assessment services can identify weaknesses in your current infrastructure that need addressing before adding AI workloads.

Phase Two: Pilot Implementation

Start with a limited pilot rather than organization-wide deployment. Choose a use case with manageable risk and clear success metrics. Implement security controls appropriate for the pilot scope.

Use the pilot to test your security monitoring, incident response procedures, and governance processes. Document lessons learned and adjust your approach before scaling.

Phase Three: Measured Expansion

Expand AI adoption based on pilot results. Each new use case should go through a structured approval process that includes security review. Build a repeatable framework rather than evaluating each deployment from scratch.

Monitor expanded deployments closely during initial periods. Security issues often emerge when systems encounter real-world usage patterns that differ from pilot conditions.

Phase Four: Continuous Improvement

AI security isn't a one-time project. Threats evolve, your AI capabilities expand, and regulatory requirements change. Build regular review cycles into your operations.

Schedule quarterly security assessments for your AI systems. Update your governance framework as you learn from experience. Stay connected with AI security developments through industry resources and trusted partners.

How Can You Measure AI Security Effectiveness?

Security investments need measurable outcomes. Track metrics that demonstrate the effectiveness of your AI security program to leadership, auditors, and stakeholders.

Operational Security Metrics

Monitor detection and response metrics specific to AI systems. How quickly do you identify suspicious AI behavior? What's your mean time to respond to AI-related security incidents? How many false positives does your AI monitoring generate?

Track coverage metrics as well. What percentage of your AI systems have implemented baseline security controls? How many have completed security assessments in the past year?

Risk Reduction Indicators

Measure the security posture improvements your program delivers. Track vulnerabilities identified and remediated in AI systems. Monitor compliance assessment results over time. Document security incidents prevented through proactive controls.

Suzu Labs' AI Trust Indexing evaluates and scores the trustworthiness and security of AI models and systems, giving you a quantifiable measure of your AI security posture that you can track over time.

Business Alignment Metrics

Connect security metrics to business outcomes. How has your security program enabled safe AI adoption? What business value have secured AI systems delivered? How has security contributed to customer trust and regulatory compliance?

These metrics help justify continued investment in AI security and demonstrate the program's contribution to organizational success.

What Common Mistakes Should You Avoid?

Learning from others' mistakes saves time and reduces risk. Here are pitfalls that commonly trip up mid-sized companies implementing AI security.

Treating AI Security as an Afterthought

Bolting security onto AI systems after deployment is far more difficult and expensive than building it in from the start. Involve your security team in AI project planning from day one. Security requirements should shape architectural decisions, not scramble to address completed designs.

Over-Relying on Vendor Security Claims

Vendors naturally highlight their security features. But marketing claims need verification. Request third-party audit reports, conduct your own security assessments, and test vendor controls before trusting sensitive data to their platforms.

Ignoring the Human Element

Most AI security incidents trace back to human error—employees sharing sensitive data with AI tools, misconfigured permissions, or failed security processes. Invest in training and awareness alongside technical controls.

Pursuing Perfection Over Progress

Waiting for perfect security before adopting AI means competitors gain advantages while you deliberate. Accept that some risk is inherent and focus on managing it to acceptable levels rather than eliminating it entirely.

Building Your AI Security Partnership

Mid-sized tech companies rarely have all the expertise needed for AI security in-house. Building relationships with specialized partners extends your capabilities without requiring permanent headcount.

Suzu Labs partners with mid-sized tech companies to address AI security challenges through services including penetration testing of AI systems, vulnerability assessments for AI infrastructure, red teaming exercises simulating AI-specific attacks, and Virtual CISO guidance for AI governance.

Whether you're evaluating your first AI platform or scaling existing AI capabilities, having experienced security partners helps you move faster with confidence. AI adoption doesn't have to mean accepting unknown risks—with the right approach and support, you can innovate securely.

FAQs about Enterprise AI Security Solutions for Mid-Sized Tech

What is the biggest AI security risk for mid-sized tech companies?

Shadow AI presents significant risk for mid-sized organizations. Employees using unapproved AI tools may inadvertently expose sensitive data or create compliance violations without IT awareness. Suzu Labs helps you discover and assess AI usage across your organization through vulnerability assessments that identify both sanctioned and shadow AI systems.

How much should mid-sized companies budget for AI security?

Budget requirements vary based on your AI adoption scope and risk tolerance. A reasonable starting point allocates 10-15% of your AI project budget to security measures. This includes assessment services, monitoring tools, and governance framework development. Partnering with Suzu Labs provides enterprise-grade expertise without full-time staffing costs.

Can we use existing security tools for AI protection?

Your existing security tools provide valuable foundation coverage, but AI-specific protections require additional capabilities. SIEM platforms can monitor AI system logs, and network tools can detect unusual traffic patterns. However, threats like prompt injection and model manipulation need specialized detection. Suzu Labs can assess your current tools and recommend targeted additions.

How long does it take to implement an AI security program?

A basic AI security framework can be operational within 8-12 weeks for mid-sized companies. This includes governance policies, baseline monitoring, and initial assessments. Full maturity takes longer—typically 12-18 months to develop advanced capabilities, train staff, and optimize processes based on operational experience.

What compliance frameworks apply to AI systems?

Multiple frameworks may apply depending on your industry and geography. NIST AI Risk Management Framework guides voluntary adoption. SOC 2 audits increasingly evaluate AI controls. GDPR affects AI processing of personal data. The EU AI Act introduces risk-based requirements. Suzu Labs' Virtual CISO services help you navigate applicable requirements and build compliant programs.

How do we assess AI vendors before signing contracts?

Evaluate AI vendors through documentation review, technical assessment, and contractual protections. Request SOC 2 reports, data processing agreements, and security architecture documentation. Conduct penetration testing of vendor integrations before production deployment. Suzu Labs can perform independent vendor security assessments to inform your purchasing decisions.

Share
Tags: AI Security Penetration Testing AI in Cybersecurity
Hannah Perez
Hannah Perez

Hannah Perez is the Director of Marketing at Suzu Labs, where she focuses on translating complex cybersecurity and AI concepts into clear, compelling stories that resonate with real people. With a background rooted in engineering and operations, Hannah brings a rare blend of technical curiosity and creative strategy to her work, bridging the gap between highly technical teams and the audiences they serve.

Stay ahead of the threat landscape

AI security insights, threat intelligence, and research from our team. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Subscribe
← Previous The AI Industry's Prescott Moment

Latest Posts

View All
Enterprise AI Security Solutions for Mid-Sized Tech 2026
AI Security
Jul 08, 2026 Hannah Perez

Enterprise AI Security Solutions for Mid-Sized Tech 2026

Finding the Right AI Security Partner for Your Growing Tech Company Your engineering team just deployed a new ...

Read More: Enterprise AI Security Solutions for Mid-Sized Tech 2026
The AI Industry's Prescott Moment
LLM
Jun 30, 2026 Jacob Krell

The AI Industry's Prescott Moment

Intel killed its fastest chip in 2004 because clock speed had become the wrong metric. AI is approaching the same ...

Read More: The AI Industry's Prescott Moment
The Kylie Effect: How Meta Just Normed the Smart Glasses Privacy Dilemma
Data Privacy
Jun 30, 2026 Hannah Perez

The Kylie Effect: How Meta Just Normed the Smart Glasses Privacy Dilemma

When tech companies first tried to put cameras on our faces, the public reaction was loud, clear, and overwhelmingly ...

Read More: The Kylie Effect: How Meta Just Normed the Smart Glasses Privacy Dilemma
The Extortion Market Has Matured, And the Response Industry Is Part of It
Threat Intelligence
Jun 25, 2026 Denis Calderone

The Extortion Market Has Matured, And the Response Industry Is Part of It

In May, a criminal extortion group told 9,000 schools to hire breach coaches and negotiate ransom payments ...

Read More: The Extortion Market Has Matured, And the Response Industry Is Part of It
The ICS Exploit Pipeline Is Built for Destruction, Not Theft
Vulnerability Management
Jun 22, 2026 Jacob Krell

The ICS Exploit Pipeline Is Built for Destruction, Not Theft

The vulnerability pipeline feeding ICS attackers is structurally optimized for breaking infrastructure, not stealing ...

Read More: The ICS Exploit Pipeline Is Built for Destruction, Not Theft
973 MCP Packages, 71% Single-Maintainer: A Practitioner's Guide to AI Developer Security
Prompt Injection
Jun 17, 2026 Jacob Krell

973 MCP Packages, 71% Single-Maintainer: A Practitioner's Guide to AI Developer Security

At a Glance AI security tooling adoption lags behind AI coding tool adoption by an order of magnitude. Download ratios: ...

Read More: 973 MCP Packages, 71% Single-Maintainer: A Practitioner's Guide to AI Developer Security
The AI Governance Gap: Verizon's 2026 DBIR Shows Attackers Scaling AI While Employees Leak Data Through It
AI Governance
May 28, 2026 Jacob Krell

The AI Governance Gap: Verizon's 2026 DBIR Shows Attackers Scaling AI While Employees Leak Data Through It

On May 20, 2026, Verizon published the 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report with a dedicated AI section built on ...

Read More: The AI Governance Gap: Verizon's 2026 DBIR Shows Attackers Scaling AI While Employees Leak Data Through It
The Remediation Paradox: Verizon's 2026 DBIR Shows Exploitation Winning While Defenders Patch Slower
Mean Time to Exploit
May 21, 2026 Jacob Krell

The Remediation Paradox: Verizon's 2026 DBIR Shows Exploitation Winning While Defenders Patch Slower

On May 20, 2026, Verizon published the [2026 Data Breach Investigations ...

Read More: The Remediation Paradox: Verizon's 2026 DBIR Shows Exploitation Winning While Defenders Patch Slower
The Extension Blind Spot: How One VS Code Plugin Gave Attackers GitHub's Source Code
Cybersecurity
May 20, 2026 Jacob Krell

The Extension Blind Spot: How One VS Code Plugin Gave Attackers GitHub's Source Code

GitHub's 3,800 Repositories Stolen Through a Single IDE Extension On May 19, 2026, a single VS Code extension on a ...

Read More: The Extension Blind Spot: How One VS Code Plugin Gave Attackers GitHub's Source Code
The Cost of a Click: Why Passive Cookie Consent Is Your Biggest Compliance Liability
May 20, 2026 Hannah Perez

The Cost of a Click: Why Passive Cookie Consent Is Your Biggest Compliance Liability

If you think a basic pop-up banner that reads "By continuing to browse this site, you accept cookies" protects your ...

Read More: The Cost of a Click: Why Passive Cookie Consent Is Your Biggest Compliance Liability
Five Years of US Privacy Breach Data Tell a Story Security Leaders Cannot Ignore
Data Privacy
May 19, 2026 Jacob Krell

Five Years of US Privacy Breach Data Tell a Story Security Leaders Cannot Ignore

In April 2026 alone, the ShinyHunters extortion group breached ADT (5.5 million customers), Amtrak (2.1 million ...

Read More: Five Years of US Privacy Breach Data Tell a Story Security Leaders Cannot Ignore
Mean Time to Exploit Has Gone Negative. Security Strategy Has to Change.
Vulnerability Management
May 05, 2026 Jacob Krell

Mean Time to Exploit Has Gone Negative. Security Strategy Has to Change.

Mandiant's M-Trends 2026 report puts estimated mean time to exploit at negative seven days. That number should reset ...

Read More: Mean Time to Exploit Has Gone Negative. Security Strategy Has to Change.
When AI Billing Breaks Trust: What the Claude Code Backlash Says About AI Governance
Prompt Injection
Apr 30, 2026 Hannah Perez

When AI Billing Breaks Trust: What the Claude Code Backlash Says About AI Governance

When AI Billing Breaks Trust: Lessons from the Claude Code Backlash AI adoption is accelerating, but trust is still ...

Read More: When AI Billing Breaks Trust: What the Claude Code Backlash Says About AI Governance
From Army Ranger to Ethical Hacker: What Cybersecurity Can Learn from the Battlefield
Cybersecurity
Apr 29, 2026 Suzu Labs

From Army Ranger to Ethical Hacker: What Cybersecurity Can Learn from the Battlefield

Cybersecurity doesn’t start with tools, it starts with mindset. In this episode featuring Aaron Colclough, we get a ...

Read More: From Army Ranger to Ethical Hacker: What Cybersecurity Can Learn from the Battlefield
When Elite Cyber Teams Can't Crack Web Security
Cybersecurity
Apr 23, 2026 Jacob Krell

When Elite Cyber Teams Can't Crack Web Security

HTB's 2025 benchmark tested 796 security teams. Only 21% passed web security challenges. The Security Illusion Security ...

Read More: When Elite Cyber Teams Can't Crack Web Security
The Invisible Threat: Business Logic Flaws in Modern Applications and Why Scanners Miss Them
Cybersecurity
Apr 22, 2026 Jacob Krell

The Invisible Threat: Business Logic Flaws in Modern Applications and Why Scanners Miss Them

In today's security landscape, some of the most dangerous vulnerabilities aren't flagged by automated scanners at all. ...

Read More: The Invisible Threat: Business Logic Flaws in Modern Applications and Why Scanners Miss Them
Suzu Labs Acquires Emulated Criminals
Apr 20, 2026 Hannah Perez

Suzu Labs Acquires Emulated Criminals

Bridging the gap between theory and the threat reality, Suzu Labs is proud to announce the acquisition of Emulated ...

Read More: Suzu Labs Acquires Emulated Criminals
The Wall Around Claude 4.7 Does Not Extend to Dread
Cybersecurity
Apr 17, 2026 Suzu Labs

The Wall Around Claude 4.7 Does Not Extend to Dread

Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.7 on April 16, 2026 with automated cybersecurity safeguards and a Cyber Verification ...

Read More: The Wall Around Claude 4.7 Does Not Extend to Dread
The Engagement Ratchet: How YouTube, Instagram, and Amazon Trained Users to Accept Less Control
youtube
Apr 10, 2026 Jacob Krell

The Engagement Ratchet: How YouTube, Instagram, and Amazon Trained Users to Accept Less Control

Earlier this year, YouTube began rolling out a row of algorithmically recommended videos at the top of the ...

Read More: The Engagement Ratchet: How YouTube, Instagram, and Amazon Trained Users to Accept Less Control
The AI Revolution: How Jobs Will Change by 2030
Cybersecurity
Apr 07, 2026 Suzu Labs

The AI Revolution: How Jobs Will Change by 2030

Host Phillip Wylie sits down with Nicolas Chaillan to discuss the sobering reality of AI replacement, the critical need ...

Read More: The AI Revolution: How Jobs Will Change by 2030
The Rosie Protocol: Is AI-Driven Personalized Medicine Finally Here?
Generative AI
Apr 01, 2026 Hannah Perez

The Rosie Protocol: Is AI-Driven Personalized Medicine Finally Here?

In late 2024, Sydney tech entrepreneur Paul Conyngham was told his rescue dog, Rosie, had months to live. She was ...

Read More: The Rosie Protocol: Is AI-Driven Personalized Medicine Finally Here?
From Analog Hacks to Agentic AI: The Evolution of Offensive Security with Denis Calderone
Cybersecurity
Mar 30, 2026 Suzu Labs

From Analog Hacks to Agentic AI: The Evolution of Offensive Security with Denis Calderone

The world of cybersecurity has undergone a massive transformation in just a few decades. In this episode of Simply ...

Read More: From Analog Hacks to Agentic AI: The Evolution of Offensive Security with Denis Calderone
While TSA Made Headlines, CISA Went Dark
Critical Infrastructure
Mar 30, 2026 Jacob Krell

While TSA Made Headlines, CISA Went Dark

The Department of Homeland Security has been partially shut down for over 45 days. In that time, 460 TSA officers have ...

Read More: While TSA Made Headlines, CISA Went Dark
The Purple Team Advantage: Bridging the Gap Between Hacking and Management with Chris Marks
AI Security
Mar 30, 2026 Suzu Labs

The Purple Team Advantage: Bridging the Gap Between Hacking and Management with Chris Marks

In cybersecurity, we often operate in silos. The red team breaks things, the blue team fixes them, and management ...

Read More: The Purple Team Advantage: Bridging the Gap Between Hacking and Management with Chris Marks
Claude Mythos and the Cybersecurity Risk That Was Already Here
Threat Intelligence
Mar 27, 2026 Jacob Krell

Claude Mythos and the Cybersecurity Risk That Was Already Here

On March 26, Anthropic confirmed the existence of Claude Mythos, an unreleased AI model described internally as "a step ...

Read More: Claude Mythos and the Cybersecurity Risk That Was Already Here
BPFdoor in Telecom Networks: The FCC Is Securing the Edge, but China's Hackers Are Already Past It
Critical Infrastructure
Mar 26, 2026 Mike Bell

BPFdoor in Telecom Networks: The FCC Is Securing the Edge, but China's Hackers Are Already Past It

Rapid7's research reveals China-linked kernel implants deep inside telecom signaling infrastructure. Here's what ...

Read More: BPFdoor in Telecom Networks: The FCC Is Securing the Edge, but China's Hackers Are Already Past It
Securing the AI Frontier: Suzu Labs Sweeps 4 Global InfoSec Awards 2026
Cybersecurity
Mar 23, 2026 Hannah Perez

Securing the AI Frontier: Suzu Labs Sweeps 4 Global InfoSec Awards 2026

We are incredibly proud to announce a monumental achievement. At this year’s Global InfoSec Awards 2026, hosted by ...

Read More: Securing the AI Frontier: Suzu Labs Sweeps 4 Global InfoSec Awards 2026
From Cockpits to Code: Josh Mason on Bridging the Gap Between Military and Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity
Mar 17, 2026 Suzu Labs

From Cockpits to Code: Josh Mason on Bridging the Gap Between Military and Cybersecurity

In the world of cybersecurity, we often talk about "gatekeeping" or the "skills gap," but rarely do we find individuals ...

Read More: From Cockpits to Code: Josh Mason on Bridging the Gap Between Military and Cybersecurity
Simply Offensive Podcast: The Future of Pentesting: AI, Automation, and Better Reporting with Dan DeCloss
Cybersecurity
Mar 16, 2026 Phillip Wylie

Simply Offensive Podcast: The Future of Pentesting: AI, Automation, and Better Reporting with Dan DeCloss

The Future of Pentesting: AI, Automation, and Better Reporting with Dan DeCloss In this episode of Simply Offensive, ...

Read More: Simply Offensive Podcast: The Future of Pentesting: AI, Automation, and Better Reporting with Dan DeCloss
From Silence to Strike: Tracking Iran's Cyber Escalation in Real Time
Critical Infrastructure
Mar 13, 2026 Denis Calderone

From Silence to Strike: Tracking Iran's Cyber Escalation in Real Time

On March 12, medical technology giant Stryker confirmed a cyberattack that wiped devices across 79 countries. The ...

Read More: From Silence to Strike: Tracking Iran's Cyber Escalation in Real Time
Internal Analysis: Even Realities G2 Smart Glasses Security & Privacy Investigation
Social Engineering
Mar 09, 2026 Suzu Labs Intelligence

Internal Analysis: Even Realities G2 Smart Glasses Security & Privacy Investigation

Executive Summary Even Realities markets its G2 smart glasses as the privacy-conscious alternative to Meta Ray-Bans. ...

Read More: Internal Analysis: Even Realities G2 Smart Glasses Security & Privacy Investigation
The Company Reviewing Your Meta Glasses Footage Has a Security Problem
Threat Intelligence
Mar 06, 2026 Mike Bell

The Company Reviewing Your Meta Glasses Footage Has a Security Problem

Last week, Swedish journalists revealed that Meta sends video footage from Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses to human data ...

Read More: The Company Reviewing Your Meta Glasses Footage Has a Security Problem
The Death of the CTF: How Agentic AI Is Reshaping Competitive Hacking
CTF
Mar 03, 2026 Jacob Krell

The Death of the CTF: How Agentic AI Is Reshaping Competitive Hacking

View White Paper Abstract: Agentic AI systems are compressing competitive hacking timelines faster than the ...

Read More: The Death of the CTF: How Agentic AI Is Reshaping Competitive Hacking
Simply Offensive Podcast: AI Killed the CTF Star with Jacob Krell
Cybersecurity
Mar 03, 2026 Phillip Wylie

Simply Offensive Podcast: AI Killed the CTF Star with Jacob Krell

In this thought-provoking episode of Simply Offensive, host Philip Wylie sits down with Jacob Krell, a penetration ...

Read More: Simply Offensive Podcast: AI Killed the CTF Star with Jacob Krell
Anthropic and Claude: 2026 AI Powerhouse
Supply Chain Security
Feb 26, 2026 Hannah Perez

Anthropic and Claude: 2026 AI Powerhouse

In early 2026, the image of Anthropic as a cautious, safety-oriented "research lab" has effectively been replaced by ...

Read More: Anthropic and Claude: 2026 AI Powerhouse
Simply Offensive Podcast: Navigating AI's Challenges in Problem Solving with Darius Houle
Cybersecurity
Feb 24, 2026 Phillip Wylie

Simply Offensive Podcast: Navigating AI's Challenges in Problem Solving with Darius Houle

In this episode of Simply Offensive, host Philip Wylie welcomes Darius Houle, an Application Security (AppSec) and ...

Read More: Simply Offensive Podcast: Navigating AI's Challenges in Problem Solving with Darius Houle
Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring the World of Hardware Hacking with Matt Brown
Cybersecurity
Feb 17, 2026 Phillip Wylie

Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring the World of Hardware Hacking with Matt Brown

In the latest episode of the Simply Offensive podcast, host Philip Wylie sat down with Matt Brown, a renowned hardware ...

Read More: Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring the World of Hardware Hacking with Matt Brown
Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring AI Vulnerabilities in Cybersecurity with Mike Bell of Suzu Labs
Cybersecurity
Feb 12, 2026 Phillip Wylie

Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring AI Vulnerabilities in Cybersecurity with Mike Bell of Suzu Labs

In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity ...

Read More: Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring AI Vulnerabilities in Cybersecurity with Mike Bell of Suzu Labs
Simply Offensive Podcast: Emulated Cyber Crime with Dahvid Schloss
Threat Intelligence
Feb 10, 2026 Phillip Wylie

Simply Offensive Podcast: Emulated Cyber Crime with Dahvid Schloss

Beyond the Pentest: Why Adversarial Emulation is the Future of Defensive Training Many organizations operate under the ...

Read More: Simply Offensive Podcast: Emulated Cyber Crime with Dahvid Schloss
Under Armour Breach: What The Forum Data Actually Shows
Threat Intelligence
Jan 30, 2026 Mike Bell

Under Armour Breach: What The Forum Data Actually Shows

On January 18, 2026, the Everest ransomware group made good on their threat and released Under Armour customer data to ...

Read More: Under Armour Breach: What The Forum Data Actually Shows
SilentFrame: A Research POC on Post-Exploitation Credential Collection through Browsers
Briefing Room
Jan 29, 2026 Dahvid Schloss

SilentFrame: A Research POC on Post-Exploitation Credential Collection through Browsers

This article is in reference to our newest POC hosted on GitHub here: https://github.com/Emulated-Criminals/SilentFrame ...

Read More: SilentFrame: A Research POC on Post-Exploitation Credential Collection through Browsers
Brightspeed Breach: Crimson Collective and the Infostealer Problem
Threat Intelligence
Jan 20, 2026 Mike Bell

Brightspeed Breach: Crimson Collective and the Infostealer Problem

Recently Crimson Collective claimed they breached Brightspeed and grabbed 1 million+ customer records. The list of data ...

Read More: Brightspeed Breach: Crimson Collective and the Infostealer Problem
When Grid Data Goes Dark Web
Power Grid
Jan 19, 2026 Mike Bell

When Grid Data Goes Dark Web

Inside a threat actor's critical infrastructure targeting In January 2026, 139 gigabytes of engineering data from a ...

Read More: When Grid Data Goes Dark Web
The $150,000 Password
Critical Infrastructure
Jan 19, 2026 Mike Bell

The $150,000 Password

How one threat actor turned stolen credentials into a global breach portfolio Between December 2025 and January 2026, a ...

Read More: The $150,000 Password
Seeing Everything, Understanding Nothing
Briefing Room
Jan 16, 2026 Dahvid Schloss

Seeing Everything, Understanding Nothing

To help you get a head start on making your environment safer and in keeping with the theme of January’s “New Year, New ...

Read More: Seeing Everything, Understanding Nothing
New Year, New Priorities - So, what to fix first?
Briefing Room
Jan 08, 2026 Dahvid Schloss

New Year, New Priorities - So, what to fix first?

The most common phrase we hear from our prospects is, “We are overwhelmed, and we aren’t sure what to tackle first.” ...

Read More: New Year, New Priorities - So, what to fix first?
UnderByte — A Ransomware experiment using Alternate Data Streams (ADS)
Briefing Room
Nov 21, 2025 Dahvid Schloss

UnderByte — A Ransomware experiment using Alternate Data Streams (ADS)

Repository purpose: this research was to evaluate the feasiabilty of using Alternate Data Stream (ADS) in staging and ...

Read More: UnderByte — A Ransomware experiment using Alternate Data Streams (ADS)
Logo copy 3-1

Fortified Security. Intelligent Innovation.

+1 (702) 766-6257
P.O. Box 750111
Las Vegas, Nevada 89136

Follow Us

About

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • FAQ's

Solutions

  • AI Advisory
  • AI Assessment
  • Offensive Security
  • Defensive Security
  • Privacy Engineering
  • Adversarial Operations
  • Social Engineering
  • Products

Resources

  • Blog
  • In The Media
  • Podcasts
© 2026 All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions