SUZU CONTINUOUS ADVERSARIAL OPERATIONS

Your adversaries iterate weekly.
Your defenses are tested annually.

Human-led Adversarial Exposure Validation by operators from U.S. Special Operations cyber units. Named adversary operations against your live environment, every month, so your team is ready for the tactics hitting your industry right now.

Book a threat briefing → Read the latest research

HUMAN-LED AEV CTEM VALIDATION PHASE OPERATOR-DELIVERED

THE THREAT TODAY

The threat landscape moves daily. Most defenses don't.

245%

Cybercrime surge tied to the Iran conflict in 2026

Measured in weeks, not quarters. Your annual pentest can't track this pace.

Handala

From wiping 200,000 Stryker devices to compromising the FBI Director's personal email — in the same month.

A single threat group shifting targets and tradecraft faster than most annual assessments can scope.

Nation-state groups, ransomware cartels, and hacktivist collectives now operate on timelines measured in days, converging cyber, social, and physical tradecraft into coordinated operations. The defenses most organizations rely on were validated once — months or years ago — against a threat model that no longer exists.

WHY ANNUAL TESTING FALLS SHORT

Periodic testing and compliance aren't a defense, they're a floor.

Point-in-time assessments tell you what was true the day the report shipped. They don't tell you whether your team can hold the line when the tactics shift next month.

WHAT POINT-IN-TIME TESTING TELLS YOU

What was true the day the report shipped.
Against a threat model frozen at scoping.
Measured against compliance controls written years ago.

WHAT IT DOESN'T TELL YOU

Whether your SOC can detect tactics your industry is facing this quarter.
Whether your detection engineering team has tuned for the adversaries hitting your peers.
Whether your incident response plan holds up under live pressure — not a tabletop.

Compliance is the floor. It was never designed to be the defense.

DOES THIS SOUND FAMILIAR?

If any of these describe your team right now, we should talk.

The buyers who get the most value from us tend to recognize themselves in one of these situations.

"My vulnerability backlog is thousands of items long and I can't tell my board which ones actually matter."

Every finding we deliver is ranked by real-world exploitability — validated by the same tradecraft active adversaries are using against your industry. You'll know which 20 issues to fix this quarter, and why, instead of staring at 2,000.

"My board asks if we're secure and I don't have a clean answer beyond 'we passed the audit.'"

After every named operation, you get a board-ready narrative: the specific adversary we emulated, the tactics we used, what your team detected, what slipped through, and what changed as a result.

"I'm done paying for pentests that hand me a PDF and disappear until next year."

We're not a vendor who shows up once a year with a report. We're a sparring partner on permanent retainer. Every month, a new named operation against your live environment.

"We've invested in every detection tool on the market and I still don't know if they'd catch an actual attack."

Our operations validate your detection stack the only way that matters: by trying to get past it. Every engagement is mapped to MITRE ATT&CK.

THE CATEGORY

Human-led Adversarial Exposure Validation.

Modern security strategies now utilize Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV) as the primary framework for continuous, evidence-based testing of organizational defenses.

Automated AEV platforms test controls with vendor-supplied attack scenarios. They're valuable. They're also limited by what automation can do.

Suzu Continuous Adversarial Operations delivers the human-led layer that automation can't replicate: year-round adversarial operations, modeled on specific threat actors active in your sector.

WHERE WE FIT IN YOUR CTEM PROGRAM

Scoping Discovery Prioritization Validation Mobilization

DEFINE THE SCOPE

Define the attack surface, assets, and adversary profiles that will be tested. Scoping ensures operations are targeted and relevant to your actual threat model.

MAP THE TERRAIN

Identify exposed assets, misconfigurations, and blind spots across your environment before active testing begins.

FOCUS THE EFFORT

Rank findings by real-world exploitability and business impact — not CVSS score. Focus remediation on the 5% of issues that actually matter.

SUZU CAO

Gartner projects that organizations running CTEM programs will be 3× less likely to suffer a breach by 2026. Suzu sits here — executing continuous, human-led adversarial operations against your live environment.

CLOSE THE GAPS

Turn validation findings into action. Work with your SOC and engineering teams to implement fixes and verify they hold under follow-on testing.

HOW IT WORKS

Named operations. Continuous cadence. Evidence every month.

Every engagement runs as a sequence of named adversary operations — each modeled on a threat actor active against your industry.

OPERATION BEAR

Russian APT supply-chain tradecraft

Targeted at your development pipeline, CI/CD infrastructure, and third-party code dependencies. Models the tactics used in Solarwinds-class and successor campaigns.

OPERATION VIPER

Iranian wiper & destructive attack playbooks

Targeted at your OT environment, backup infrastructure, and recovery systems. Models the tactics used by Handala and peer destructive-attack groups.

OPERATION JACKAL

Ransomware cartel initial-access patterns

Targeted at your identity layer, VPN infrastructure, and human attack surface. Models the tactics used by active ransomware affiliate programs.

Scoped

Each operation is scoped to a specific threat actor active in your industry, with defined rules of engagement.

Executed

Operators run the campaign against your live production environment under strict controls and deconfliction.

Measured

Every action mapped to MITRE ATT&CK. Attack-by-attack evidence of what we got through and what your team detected.

Debriefed

A working session with your SOC, detection engineering, and IR teams — reps turn into improvements.

WHO RUNS YOUR OPERATIONS

Operators, not consultants.

The Suzu CAO Team is led by veterans of U.S. Special Operations cyber units and enterprise red teams. Every operator has real-world experience executing offensive operations under rules of engagement with real consequences.

We don’t study adversaries. We operate like them, under rules of engagement that keep your environment safe.

U.S. Special Operations cyber and offensive cyber backgrounds.
DEFCON Black Badge holders on the team.
Research cited in 300+ outlets in 2026 — Forbes, SC Media, Computer Weekly, Dark Reading.
Four years of enterprise engagements CHNAGE THIS

WHAT YOU GET

After 90 days, you will have:

Tangible, board-ready evidence, not a PDF and a handshake.

Validated (or invalidated) every detection in your SIEM against current adversary tradecraft.
Measured your SOC's detection and response time against three different named threat actors.
Identified the specific control gaps that would let an active campaign reach your crown jewels.
A detection engineering backlog ranked by real-world exploitability, not theoretical CVSS.
A board-ready narrative of what you've actually tested against, not just what you've complied with.
Access to the Suzu CAO Portal — every finding, attack path, and improvement tracked in real time.

Book a Threat Briefing

See an adversary playbook your industry is facing right now.

Book a 30-minute threat briefing. We'll walk you through one current named operation — the adversary, the tradecraft, and how we'd run it against an environment like yours.

No slides. No pitch. Just a briefing.

We'll be in touch within one business day to schedule your briefing. No sales follow-up sequence — just the briefing.

Reserve your briefing

When Elite Cyber Teams Can't Crack Web Security

Cybersecurity

Apr 23, 2026 Jacob Krell

When Elite Cyber Teams Can't Crack Web Security

HTB's 2025 benchmark tested 796 security teams. Only 21% passed web security challenges. The ...

The Invisible Threat: Business Logic Flaws in Modern Applications and Why Scanners Miss Them