Skip to main content
Suzu Logo
  • Home
  • Product
  • Our Solutions
    • AI Advisory
    • AI Assessment
    • AI Integration
    • Cybersecurity Services
  • About
    • About Us
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • In The Media
    • Podcasts
    • All Resources
Contact Us
Back to Blog
Threat Intelligence Cybersecurity

Under Armour Breach: What The Forum Data Actually Shows

Mike Bell January 30, 2026 4 min read
Table of Contents

    On January 18, 2026, the Everest ransomware group made good on their threat and released Under Armour customer data to BreachForums. Two months earlier, Everest had added Under Armour to their leak site with a seven-day deadline. The company didn't pay. Now 72.7 million email addresses are sitting in Have I Been Pwned, and Under Armour still hasn't publicly acknowledged the incident.

    We analyzed the leaked data and the forum discussion around it. Here's what we found.

    The Initial Announcement

    Under Armor BreachForums

    The forum post from user "thelastwhitehat" claimed 343 GB of sensitive data including "full names, email addresses, geographic locations, genders, purchase histories and preferences, employee contact details, and more." Everest's original claims were even broader, including phone numbers, physical addresses, loyalty program details, and preferred stores.

    That's a significant amount of PII if accurate. But forum users who actually downloaded and analyzed the data found something different.

    What's Actually In The Leak

    Actually in the leak

    Within 24 hours of the data hitting the forums, users started reporting discrepancies. User "ThinkingOne" noted: "there do not appear to be any phone numbers in here. There is a phone number header in some of the files, but no actual phone numbers. Also, few/no last names, no addresses."

    That's a meaningful distinction. Headers exist for sensitive fields, but the data isn't there. What Everest claimed and what they actually exfiltrated are two different things.

    The File Structure

    Breach file structure

    The leaked archive contains 29 CSV files totaling 191,577,361 records. The largest files are mobile push notification exports (69M and 71M records respectively), followed by Bluecore marketing exports and loyalty customer data.

    The file naming convention tells the story. These are marketing system exports, not production database dumps:

    • Bluecore exports - Email marketing platform data
    • MobilePush_TotalGenderData - Push notification targeting
    • NorthAmerica_MasterPush_Segmentation - Marketing segmentation
    • Customer_360_SFMC_Preferred_Store - Salesforce Marketing Cloud data
    • RatingsAndReviews_SourceData - Customer review data
    • RetailPurchases_Last30_SourceData - Recent transaction data

    This is marketing tech infrastructure. Email addresses, purchase behavior, marketing preferences. Valuable for targeted phishing campaigns, but not the full PII profiles Everest advertised.

    What This Means For Affected Customers

    The 72.7 million unique email addresses are real. If you've shopped at Under Armour, your email is likely in this dataset along with your purchase history and marketing preferences. That's enough for convincing phishing attempts that reference your actual buying behavior.

    What's probably not exposed: your home address, phone number, or payment information. The forum analysis suggests those fields either weren't captured by the marketing systems that were compromised, or weren't populated in the exports Everest obtained.

    What This Means For Under Armour

    Two months of silence while a class action lawsuit gets filed and millions of customers check breach notification services is a communications failure regardless of what's in the data. Customers are making assumptions, and those assumptions are probably worse than reality.

    More importantly, this breach reveals something about their security posture. Marketing platforms sit at the edge of the network. They integrate with everything. They often get stood up by marketing teams without going through normal security review processes. Most security programs have better visibility into production databases than they do into martech, and that blind spot is exactly what Everest exploited here.

    Understanding where the initial access came from and why these systems were accessible is what prevents the next incident. Cleanup without root cause analysis is just waiting for round two.

    About Everest

    Everest has been operating since 2020, making them unusually long-lived for a ransomware group. According to security researchers, they run three parallel revenue streams: double extortion ransomware, network access brokerage (selling access to other crews), and an insider recruitment program. Under Armour was one target in a portfolio that includes aerospace contractors, power grid operators, and government agencies.

    Timeline

    Date Event
    November 15, 2025 Breach occurs (per forum claims)
    November 2025 Everest adds Under Armour to leak site with 7-day deadline
    November 24, 2025 Class action lawsuit filed
    January 18, 2026 Data published on BreachForums
    January 19, 2026 Forum users report phone number fields are empty
    January 21, 2026 HIBP ingests 72.7M records
    Present Under Armour has not publicly acknowledged the incident
    Share
    Tags: Threat Intelligence Cybersecurity
    Mike Bell
    Mike Bell

    Founder and CEO of Suzu Labs, a veteran-owned cybersecurity firm specializing in security assessments, data privacy, and AI-powered business intelligence. He is a U.S. Army veteran with an active security clearance and over two decades of experience in cybersecurity.

    ← Previous Brightspeed Breach: Crimson Collective and the Infostealer Problem Next → Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring AI Vulnerabilities in Cybersecurity with Mike Bell of Suzu Labs

    Latest Posts

    View All
    The Company Reviewing Your Meta Glasses Footage Has a Security Problem
    Threat Intelligence
    Mar 06, 2026 Mike Bell

    The Company Reviewing Your Meta Glasses Footage Has a Security Problem

    Last week, Swedish journalists revealed that Meta sends video footage from Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses to human data ...

    Read More
    The Death of the CTF: How Agentic AI Is Reshaping Competitive Hacking
    CTF
    Mar 03, 2026 Jacob Krell

    The Death of the CTF: How Agentic AI Is Reshaping Competitive Hacking

    View White Paper Abstract: Agentic AI systems are compressing competitive hacking timelines faster than the ...

    Read More
    Anthropic and Claude: 2026 AI Powerhouse
    Supply Chain Security
    Feb 26, 2026 Hannah Perez

    Anthropic and Claude: 2026 AI Powerhouse

    In early 2026, the image of Anthropic as a cautious, safety-oriented "research lab" has effectively been replaced by ...

    Read More
    Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring AI Vulnerabilities in Cybersecurity with Mike Bell of Suzu Labs
    Cybersecurity
    Feb 12, 2026 Phillip Wylie

    Simply Offensive Podcast: Exploring AI Vulnerabilities in Cybersecurity with Mike Bell of Suzu Labs

    In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity ...

    Read More
    Under Armour Breach: What The Forum Data Actually Shows
    Threat Intelligence
    Jan 30, 2026 Mike Bell

    Under Armour Breach: What The Forum Data Actually Shows

    On January 18, 2026, the Everest ransomware group made good on their threat and released Under Armour customer data to ...

    Read More
    Brightspeed Breach: Crimson Collective and the Infostealer Problem
    Threat Intelligence
    Jan 20, 2026 Mike Bell

    Brightspeed Breach: Crimson Collective and the Infostealer Problem

    Recently Crimson Collective claimed they breached Brightspeed and grabbed 1 million+ customer records. The list of data ...

    Read More
    When Grid Data Goes Dark Web
    Power Grid
    Jan 19, 2026 Mike Bell

    When Grid Data Goes Dark Web

    Inside a threat actor's critical infrastructure targeting In January 2026, 139 gigabytes of engineering data from a ...

    Read More
    The $150,000 Password
    Critical Infrastructure
    Jan 19, 2026 Mike Bell

    The $150,000 Password

    How one threat actor turned stolen credentials into a global breach portfolio Between December 2025 and January 2026, a ...

    Read More
    Logo copy 3-1

    Fortified Security. Intelligent Innovation.

    +1 (702) 766-6257
    P.O. Box 750111
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89136

    Follow Us

    About

    • About Us
    • Contact

    Solutions

    • Products
    • AI Advisory
    • AI Assessment
    • Cybersecurity

    Resources

    • Insights
    • In The Media
    • Podcasts
    © 2026 All rights reserved.
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions